<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curatorialist &#187; Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curatorialist.com/category/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curatorialist.com</link>
	<description>essential creativity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 03:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Warning: Typographic Content</title>
		<link>http://curatorialist.com/2009/09/03/warning-typographic-content/</link>
		<comments>http://curatorialist.com/2009/09/03/warning-typographic-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curatorialist.com/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When The NY Times had their typographic face lift of 2003, they obviously put a lot of thought into it. They replaced what was a mishmash of different typefaces with one family: Cheltenham. It was a decision that everyone could live with. Indeed, it was the kind of bold (yeah, I said it) move that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://curatorialist.com/2009/09/03/warning-typographic-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
